HAJNAL ANDRÉKA, ISTVÁN NÉMETI and JOHAN VAN BENTHEM MODAL LANGUAGES AND BOUNDED FRAGMENTS OF PREDICATE LOGIC 1. MODAL LOGIC AND CLASSICAL LOGIC
نویسندگان
چکیده
Modal Logic is traditionally concerned with the intensional operators “possibly” and “necessary”, whose intuitive correspondence with the standard quantifiers “there exists” and “for all” comes out clearly in the usual Kripke semantics. This observation underlies the well-known translation from propositional modal logic with operators ♦ and , possibly indexed, into the first-order language over possible worlds models (van Benthem 1976, 1984). In this way, modal formalisms correspond to fragments of a full first-order (or sometimes higher-order) language over these models, which are both expressively perspicuous and deductively tractable. In this paper, by the “modal fragment” of predicate logic we understand the set of all first-order formulas obtainable as translations of basic (poly-)modal formulas. As the modal fragment is merely a notational variant of the basic modal language, we will often refer to the two interchangeably. Basic modal logic shares several nice properties with full predicate logic, namely, finite axiomatizability, Craig Interpolation and Beth Definability, as well as model-theoretic preservation results such as the Loś–Tarski Theorem characterizing those formulas that are preserved under taking submodels. In addition, basic modal logic has some nice properties not shared with predicate logic as a whole: e.g., its axiomatization does not need side conditions on free or bound variables – and most evidently: basic modal logic is decidable. We shall concentrate on this list in what follows, in the hope that it forms a representative sample. Our aim is to find natural fragments of predicate logic extending the modal one which inherit the above-mentioned nice properties. This quest has two virtues. It forces us to understand why basic modal logic has these nice properties. And it points the way to new insights concerning predicate logic itself. Note that this study takes place over the universe of all models, without special restrictions on accessibility relations. This is the domain of the “minimal modal logic”, which
منابع مشابه
Modal Logic with Bounded Quantification over Worlds
In this paper, we present a logical framework that combines modality with a first-order variable-binding mechanism. The logic, which belongs to the family of hybrid languages, differs from standard first-order modal logics in that quantification is not performed inside the worlds of a model, but the worlds in the model themselves constitute the domain of quantification. The locality principle o...
متن کاملWeaker Axioms, More Ranges
In the family of many-valued modal languages proposed by M. Fitting in 1992, every modal language is based on an underlying Heyting algebra which provides the space of truth values. The lattice of truth values is explicitly represented in the language by a set of special constants and this allows for forming weak, generalized, many-valued analogs of all classical modal axioms. Weak axioms of th...
متن کاملShallow Models for Non-iterative Modal Logics
Modal logics see a wide variety of applications in artificial intelligence, e.g. in reasoning about knowledge, belief, uncertainty, agency, defaults, and relevance. From the perspective of applications, the attractivity of modal logics stems from a combination of expressive power and comparatively low computational complexity. Compared to the classical treatment of modal logics with relational ...
متن کاملLogics for resource-bounded agents
In this thesis, I criticise traditional epistemic logics based on possible worlds semantics, inspired by Hintikka, as a framework for representing the beliefs and knowledge of agents. The traditional approach suffers from the logical omniscience problem: agents are modelled as knowing all consequences of their knowledge, which is not an admissible assumption when modelling real-world reasoning ...
متن کاملSummer Meeting of the Association for Symbolic Logic
s of invited plenary talks ◮ JAN A. BERGSTRA, INGE BETHKE, AND ALBAN PONSE, Decision problems for pushdown threads. Department of Philosophy, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 8, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands, and Programming Research Group, Informatics Institute, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]. Programming ResearchGroup, Informatics Institute, Univers...
متن کامل